Wednesday, August 21, 2019
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay    IMMUNOLOGY PRATICAL ASSIGNMENT  ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY  mODULE NAME: Clinical immunology  MODULE NUMBER: APS6004  MODULE LEADER: DR JULIA REY-NORES  STUDENT NUMBER: 20031761  BSc (H) BMS 3  2014/2015  Introduction  The history of immunoassay was developed by Roalyn Yalow and Solomon Berson in 1950 used the Radio-immunoassay (RIA) and they awarded in 1977 Nobel Prize because they developed RIA to detect and measure the level of glucose in the blood for diabetic patient. However, the technology was build up by replacing the radio-isotopes with enzymes to make colour generation that was in 1960. ]1, 2, 3[  More than 40 years, immunoassays use in different places, like laboratory medicine, hospitals and research to improve the health also for many purposes. In addition, immunoassay use in life science research to study the biology system by chase different, hormones, proteins and antibody. However, it use in industry to detect contaminants in food and water. Also, used as quality control to observe specific molecules used through product processing. ]1[  Nowadays, the immunochemistry technology develops assays to try eliminate as many dilution, mixing and measuring. Immunoassays are technique used to detect specific molecule. Itââ¬â¢s rely on the ingrained ability of antibody that are bind to the specific structure of molecules. This techniques are quick and accurate itââ¬â¢s depend on the antibody and antigen that found in the blood and tissue fluids. ]1[  There are many type of immunoassays such as radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fluorescent immunoassay (FIA), and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). ]3,5[  In this report file I will focus on ELISA this technique that I used in the laboratory during two weeks to detect the antibody and the antigen. There is different types of ELISA:    Direct ELISA  Indirect ELISA  Sandwich ELISA  Competitive ELISA [3]    Direct ELISA  This method technique depend on the antigen that coated in the surface of plate and the antibody of the patient and conjugated enzyme. ]5[    Figure 1 shows steps of direct ELISA  The indirect ELISA  The technique used the micro plate coated with antigen. The primary antibody added to react with the antigen that fixed to the plate. Then washed away. Added enzyme conjugated secondary antibody anti-isotope antibody which binds to the primary antibody. After that washed away and added the substrate enzyme to produce the reaction colour that determined the amount of the antibody. ]3,7[    Figure 2 show the steps of the indirect ELISA  Sandwich ELISA  Sandwich ELISA is the technique that used to detect the antibody or antigen that are present in the patient blood. This technique also called capture method because it detect level of antigen between two layers of antibodies. The antigen to be measure in the technique should contain at least two antigenic epitope capable of binding antibody. Sandwich ELISA has many advantages for example high specificity, flexibility and sensitivity. ]3,8[    Figure 3 shows the steps of sandwich ELISA  The aim of practical:    To achieve a grid experimental to detect the optimal detection and capture antibody titration, by using monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG and polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies.  To determine the concentration of unknown sample X and Y.    Materials:    Coating buffer: phosphate buffer saline (PBS)  Wash buffer: 0.05% Tween 20à ®in PBS, pH 7.4  Diluent: PBS  Blocking solution: 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS  Antigen : rabbit IgG  Coating antibody: Mouse anti-rabbit IgG monoclonal antibody  Detection antibody :Goat anti-rabbit IgG ââ¬â peroxidase conjugated  Colour reagent .tetramethyl benzidine (TMB)  Stop solution (1M HCL)  96-well micro plate  Adjustable micropipette    Practical week 1  Methods:  This step was done by the lab technician to make the 96-well plate coated with antigen ready to the students because itââ¬â¢s take long time.    Figure 4 show the rabbit IgG antigen serial dilution by using 100à µl coating buffer  Monoclonal and polyclonal antibody procedure in tables 1 and 2:    Procedure of Monoclonal antibody    Procedure of Polyclonal antibody    Added 100à µl of diluents of buffer PBS from column 2-6 in the first plate    Added 100à µl of buffer PBS from column 8-12 in the second half of the plate    Added 200à µl of monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG from A1well to H1 well    Added 200à µl of goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP to column 7    transferred 100à µl by doing serial dilution mixed well from column 1 to columns 2 ,3,4,5,6 then discard 100à µl from well 6    Transferred 100à µl by doing serial dilution from column 7 to columns 8,9,10,11,12 then 100à µl discard from colum12 (mixed well)    Covered the plate and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes.    Covered the plate and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes.    Washed the plate three times with wash buffer    Washed the plate three times with wash buffer    Table 1  The final steps    100à µl of goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP was added to columns 1 to 6    200à µl of goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP was added to columns 7 to 12    The plate was covered and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes    The plate was washed three times with the washing buffer    100à µl of substrate (TMP) was added to all the columns from 1-12 and incubated at room temperature and the plate was observed to check the change of colour to blue colour.    After the colour become blue 50à µl of stop reaction 1 M HCL was added to all wells    The colour will change to yellow    The result was read by spectrophotometer    Table 2    Figure 7 shows steps  Week one: result    Graph 1 shows the results of mouse anti-rabbit IgG monoclonal antibody titration in different dilution  Result    Graph 2 shows results of goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled antibody in different dilution  Practical week 2  Method:    Step done by lab technician coated 20 wells overnight with 100à µl/well of the capture antibody (monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG ) and kept ready for use.( sandwich ELISA)  Added 200à µl of rabbit IgG to well A1 and A2  Added 100à µl of PBS diluents to wells from B to H in column 1and 2  From A1, 100à µl rabbit IgG was taken and added to B1 then serial dilution take place up to G1 then 100à µl was discarded from G1  100à µl of rabbit IgG was taken from A2 and added to B2 then continued the serial dilution up to G2 then 100à µl from G2 discarded  Well H1 and H2 was used as blank  Added 100à µl of unknown sample X to wells (A3 and A4)  Added 100à µl of unknown sample Y to wells (B3 and B4)  Incubated the plate for 30 minutes at room temperature  Washed the plate 3 times with washing buffer PBS  Added 100à µl of goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled to all 20 wells  Incubated the plate for 30 minutes at room temperature  Washed the plate 3 times with Buffer BPS  Added 100à µl TMB substrate to all 20 wells  Incubated the plate and protected from the light until colour develops  Added 50à µl stop reaction with (1 M HCL acid)  Read absorbance at 450 nm by spectrophotometer    The result:    Graph 3 shows standard calibration curve of rabbit IgG    Graph 4 shows the equation log of concentration rabbit IgG  Calculation of samples    Table 3 shows the calculation to found the concentration of samples X and Y  Discussion  From the result that shows in graph one there are six curves of the monoclonal mouse anti-rabbit IgG with different serious dilutions(1:2000, 1:4000, 1:8000, 1:16000, 1:32000, 1:64000). From my result, the dilution 1:2000 is increase fast and it consumption more antibodies which is not recommended. The best dilution is 1:4000 because it gradually increase with less antibodies and this dilution can detect the lowest concentration of antigen and also can be used for more numbers of samples. However, the dilution 1:8000 it increase but is less than dilution 1:4000 it need more antibody, while the dilutions (1:16000, 1:32000, 1:64000) need more antibodies and not detect antigen in low concentration.  The graph 2 shows the result of polyclonal antibody and the graph has sex different curves with different serious dilutions ((1:2000, 1:4000, 1:8000, 1:16000, 1:32000, 1:64000) the first dilution 1:2000 increase sharp until concentration of 1000, then decrease slowly up concentration of 2000 so this dilution not recommended due to over opsonisation of antibodies. The second, dilution 1:4000 increased gradually and it need less antibody and can detect the lowest concentration of antigen so it is the optimum for the goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled antibody. Third dilution 1:8000 is increase slow and require more antibody. The last three dilutions, 1:16000, 1:32000, and 1:64000 are not showing significant elevation when increase the concentration and cannot used because it not detect high absorbance of antigen.  The graph 3 shows the calibration curve of the known concentration to determine the concentration of two unknown samples X and Y. the graph 4 shows the equation make by log concentration of calibration curve to calculated the concentration of unknown samples.  During this practical I learned a lot of important things such as the best technique to choose the dilution of antibody and antigen detection. Also, to compare between the best antibody to detect antigen.  There are many factors that affect the result of ELISA like the incubation time should be 1 hour but we reduced to 30 minutes and this not enough for the reaction take place between antibody and antigen, manual washing cause insufficient washing and mixed with other micro plate wells. The pipettes some time not working due to some problem of tips.  Conclusion  In conclusion, the optimum monoclonal Mouse anti-rabbit IgG antibody concentration is 1/4000, while the optimum polyclonal Goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP labelled antibody concentration is 1/4000, and the concentration of unknown sample( X )is 287ng/ml and unknown of sample (Y) concentration is 41ng/ml. the ELISA is the best technique to detect the reaction between antibody and antigen.  Reference  1-Avrameas, S. (2006). Historical Background of the Invention of EIA and ELISA. Clinical Chemistry, 52(7), pp.1430a-1431.  2Tulsidas G, S. (2002). HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY IN LIFE SCIENCES WITH REFERENCE TO IMMUNOASSAY IN MEDICINE. Health and Population, 3(25), pp.140-147.  3- Owen, J. et al. 2009. Immunology by Kuby. 7th ed. New York: W. H Freeman and Company.  4-Immunochemistry.com, (2014). Apoptosis, Caspases, Assay Development, ELISA Buffers, ELISA Detection. [online] Available at: http://www.immunochemistry.com [Accessed 26 Nov. 2014].  5-Accelero-bioanalytics.com, (2014). Home  Acceleroà ® Bioanalytics GmbH. [online] Available at: http://www.accelero-bioanalytics.com [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014]  6-Wieslab.com, (2014). Wieslab Laboratory Services  Home. [online] Available at: http://www.wieslab.com [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014].  7-Pharmatutor.org, (2014). Articles | PharmaTutor. [online] Available at: http://www.pharmatutor.org/articles [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014].  8-Elisa-antibody.com, (2014). ELISA Antibody, protocol and troubleshooting. [online] Available at: http://www.elisa-antibody.com [Accessed 27 Nov. 2014].  Appendix  Result week one practical    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    12    2.1104    2.1292    1.9613    1.6637    1.3974    1.2574    3.2528    1.8449    0.9561    0.4939    0.2465    0.1338    1.8208    1.5499    1.4053    1.5323    1.0412    0.7042    3.4643    1.5967    0.8303    0.4028    0.2565    0.1613    1.4231    1.3054    0.5794    0.9972    0.8248    0.6163    2.8907    1.313    0.6298    0.3189    0.1761    0.1112    1.0608    0.9475    0.8302    0.6554    0.5236    0.3168    2.2198    1.065    0.5392    0.2867    0.1652    0.1013    0.7257    0.7008    0.6846    0.6725    0.5747    0.5967    1.6108    0.7602    0.6945    0.3432    0.1921    0.1128    0.513    0.4868    0.4624    0.3917    0.4104    0.3967    0.9931    0.5756    0.3218    0.17    0.1043    0.1606    0.3335    0.3444    0.3188    0.3414    0.3042    0.2611    0.6909    0.3377    0.1896    0.1087    0.0786    0.0585    0.0797    0.0856    0.0774    0.0677    0.0772    0.0886    0.1005    0.0566    0.0459    0.0473    0.0498    0.0589    Table 1 shows the result of the absorbance of monoclonal antibody and polyclonal antibody    concentration    1/2000    1/4000    1/8000    1/16000    1/32000    1/64000    2000    2.0307    2.0436    1.8839    1.596    1.3202    1.1688    1000    1.7411    1.4643    1.3279    1.4646    0.964    0.6156    500    1.3434    1.2198    0.502    0.9295    0.7476    0.5277    250    0.9811    0.8619    0.7528    0.5877    0.4464    0.2282    125    0.646    0.6152    0.6072    0.6048    0.4975    0.5081    62    0.4333    0.4012    0.385    0.324    0.3332    0.3081    31    0.2538    0.2588    0.2414    0.2737    0.227    0.1725    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    Table 2 the results of the absorbance of monoclonal antibody after subscription of the absorbance from blank    concentration    1/2000    1/4000    1/8000    1/16000    1/32000    1/64000    2000    3.1523    1.7883    0.9102    0.4466    0.1967    0.0749    1000    3.3638    1.5401    0.7844    0.3555    0.2067    0.1024    500    2.7902    1.2564    0.5839    0.2716    0.1263    0.0523    250    2.1193    1.0084    0.4933    0.2394    0.1154    0.0424    125    1.5103    0.7036    0.6486    0.2959    0.1423    0.0539    62    0.8926    0.519    0.2759    0.1227    0.0545    0.1017    31    0.5904    0.2811    0.1437    0.0614    0.0288    -0.0004    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    Table 3 shows the results of polyclonal antibody after subscription of blank  Result of week 2 practical    1    2    3    4    A    0.6084    0.5426    0.4306    0.419    B    0.5699    0.4589    0.2425    0.2505    C    0.5602    0.4504    D    0.5085    0.4093    E    0.4238    0.3164    F    0.3004    0.2355    G    0.1997    0.1794    H    0.1242    0.1093    Table 4 shows the result of rabbit IgG absorbance and two unknown sample    Concentration IgG (ng/ml)    1    2    mean    mean- blank    sample    sample    mean    mean- blank    2000    0.6084    0.5426    0.5755    0.45875    X=0.4306    X=0.419    0.4248    0.308    1000    0.5699    0.4589    0.5144    0.39765    Y=0.2425    Y=0.2505    0.2465    0.1297    500    0.5602    0.4504    0.5053    0.38855    250    0.5085    0.4093    0.4589    0.34215    125    0.4238    0.3164    0.3701    0.25335    62    0.3004    0.2355    0.26795    0.1512    31    0.1997    0.1794    0.18955    0.0728    0    0.1242    0.1093    0.11675    0    Table 5 shows the steps of rabbit IgG and two unknown sample, mean then subscription of blank to make calibration curve and equation to get the concentration of sample X and X  Abbreviation  RIA Radioimmunoassay  EIA Enzyme immunoassay  FIA Fluorescent immunoassay  ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay  PBS Phosphate buffer saline  BSA Bovine serum albumin  TMB Tetramethyl benzidine  HRP Horseradish peroxidase  1M HCL 1 molar of Hydrochloric acid  Log Logarithm  Y Absorbance  IgG immunoglobulin G  X Concentration   Result ignore    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.